Wilde’s hypocrisy when commenting on his characters
In a letter dated February 12th
1894, Wilde wrote: “Basil
Hallward is what I think I am : Lord
Henry what the world thinks me:
Dorian what I would like to be –in
other ages, perhaps”[Holland and
Hart Davis: 585]
In a letter, it is quoted that Oscar Wilde believed himself, out of all the characters in his hit literary novel, “The picture of Dorian Gray”, to be the character of Basil Hallward. This statement can be seen as hypocritical in more ways than one. The character of Basil Hallward may be drawn towards aestheticism but his thoughts and regulations are far beyond what the eye can see, juxtaposing the very nature of the movement. Either Wilde is attempting to establish an ulterior motive to his statement and his lifestyle, or he has unjustly tripped on his own words.
From the very beginning, the reader is introduced to Basil Hallward as a man who savours secrecy. This is evident in the first conversation made public to the reader, when Basil confides in Lord Henry that “The commonest thing is delightful if only one hides.”[Oscar Wilde, 7] This being the justification for refusing to provide a name to the painting Henry adores. This juxtaposes with Oscar Wilde’s outspoken aesthetic lifestyle: a lifestyle of which he was a proud preacher. This makes the comparison much more inconspicuous. It may also be an allusion towards how Wilde was forced to keep his homosexual preferences a secret during his time, as it was quite illegal and punishable by death, opening the argument that the true reason Basil refused to reveal the painting was due to his homosexual feelings and desires towards Dorian Gray shining through.
Hallward differs from Wilde in his interpretations of his art. Whereas in an aesthetic lifestyle, it is believed that “art is for arts sake”, we see something very different in Basil. He protests against the display of his painting for “There is too much of myself the thing, Harry – too much of myself!” [Oscar Wilde, 13] He begs and pleads with Lord Henry to understand his demise. “… and I will not bare my soul to their shallow, prying eyes.” [Oscar Wilde, 13] he says, yet Lord Henry stays cynical of his reasoning. In this context, it could easily be said that Lord Henry is an aesthete. Unlike Basil, he finds no unearthly and ethereal meaning behind the painting and it’s painter, he sees it only as a work of art: nothing more, nothing less. When confronted with a stubborn refusal to showcase the painting, Henry responds with naive criticism upon how the painting could never resemble Basil as the subject is far too beautiful. He does not attempt to dig deeper into the reasoning behind such intense denial. In this way and many others, Oscar Wilde has proven right the statement “Lord Henry [is] what the world thinks of me:”
What is most interesting about Wilde’s overall statement is when he states that “Dorian what [He] would like to be – in other ages, perhaps.” It is the uncertainty in this line that is the pitfall of the author. Knowing what consequences are attached to possessing utmost beauty, Wilde himself predicted the inevitable down fall of the beautiful Dorian Gray. If Wilde believed so firmly in the aesthetic lifestyle, it must be seen as highly ironic how he portrays the dangers of ‘only touching the surface’, of only seeing the superficial characteristics of a person and defining them by it. The killing of Basil Hallward only echos this fact. By murdering Hallward, Wilde has benefited his cause of aestheticism by proving art no more than to please the viewer with it’s allure. By associating Dorian’s worth and purpose with his outwardly appearance, he was driven to the taking of another soul and self murder, making his overdosed expressions all the more representative of the baggage that comes with beauty: the drug of choice being vanity.
Oscar Wilde is not completely wrong in comparing himself to his characters, yet doing so shatters his whole perspective of ‘art for art’s sake’. Although, it can be argued that a bit of each character can be seen in Wilde, from Basil’s love for the beautiful and Lord Henry’s clever epigrams to Dorian’s lust for preserving that which is beautiful. In the end, the biggest act of hypocrisy lies not within his lifestyle, but his books.